The first guide is up. It is the one nobody else writes.
The alternative to an empty insights section is a full one, padded with articles restating what is already on the service pages. We are not doing that. Guides appear here as they are written — each dated, each resting on something you can check — and the first one covers the subject this market avoids: what actually happens when you close a Turkish company.
One guide is published, below. Beyond it, the material worth reading is in the capability pages and the glossary: they carry the legal references, the distinctions that cost money and the questions we are actually asked.
Those are listed further down, grouped by what a reader is usually trying to work out.
If you are still deciding.
Whether Türkiye is worth entering, in what form, and what it costs to unwind.
Opportunity Scan
What the trade data says about your customs code before you commit to anything.
Entering Türkiye
Four decisions before the company, and why the exit belongs among them.
Company, branch or liaison office
What each may do, and why the bank rather than the registry decides your timeline.
If your product physically moves.
Classification, duty, storage status and distribution — the chain where entries usually fail quietly.
Customs & Foreign Trade
Who may be the importer of record, and why the last four digits of a GTİP carry the money.
Bonded or free warehouse
The distinction that decides when you pay duty and VAT, and when bonded actually earns its cost.
Market access
Whether a CE-marked product may simply be sold here, and where that assumption breaks.
If you are already here.
Obligations, certification, and the two ways an operation ends.
Tam tasdik and the exit
Why the cheapest decision about closing your company is made in year one.
Handover or closure
The two endings, and why almost nobody in this market describes either.
Glossary
The words that cost money when they are confused, with the Turkish terms left intact.
What we will
not publish.
Numbers we cannot keep current. A duty rate, an employer-cost multiplier or a clearance timeline published once and left for two years is worse than nothing, because somebody puts it in a plan. Where we publish a figure it carries a date and a source.
Named competitors with counts attached. We research this market closely and it informs what we build. Publishing comparisons about named firms invites a dispute we do not need and dates badly. Where a market-wide pattern matters — for instance that almost nobody here sells the exit — we describe the pattern.
Articles written to fill a page. If a subject does not have something specific in it that a reader cannot get elsewhere, it does not get written.
What is being written.
Subjects where we have something specific to say. Each will be dated and sourced when it appears.
- 01
Importer of record without your own entity
The three routes, the liability allocation each requires, and the wording that makes the third one hold.
In preparation - 02
Liaison office — what it can do, and the exemption nobody explains
Including why the structure is underused and whose interest that serves. The structure selector already publishes the time limits.
In preparation - 03
Bonded warehouse — when it pays and when it does not
Worked through on turnover rate, duty rate and cost of capital rather than as a general recommendation.
In preparation - 04
Employer of record in Türkiye — what the market sells and what the law says
Held until we have formal legal advice. We are not publishing a view on this before we can support it.
Awaiting legal opinion
About this section.
Beginning with the obvious one.
Why is this section so short?
Because it started on 30 September 2026 and carries one guide so far. yobiT is a new brand, and the alternative to a short section is a padded one that restates what is already on our service pages.
The first guide covers closing a Turkish company, which is the subject this market avoids and the one companies ask about most often once they trust us enough to raise it. Beyond it, the substance lives in the capability pages and the glossary. Guides go here as they are written, each with a date and the sources it rests on.
Will you publish numbers — timelines, costs, tax rates?
Only where we can stand behind them and keep them current. A duty rate, an employer cost multiplier or a clearance timeline published once and left for two years is worse than nothing, because somebody puts it in a plan.
Where we do publish a figure it carries a date and a source. Where the honest answer depends on your case, the page says that instead of estimating.
Do you write about competitors?
Not by name and not with numbers. We do a great deal of competitive research and it informs what we build, but publishing counts and comparisons about named firms invites a dispute we do not need and would date quickly.
Where a market-wide pattern matters to a reader — for example that almost nobody in this market sells the exit — we describe the pattern rather than the firms.
Can we suggest a subject?
Yes, and it is the most useful way to influence this list. The subjects worth writing are the ones companies actually ask about twice, and we only learn which those are from being asked.